FC2ブログ

次の戦争計画

デーヴィッド・アイク(David Icke)の情報http://icke.seesaa.net/


デーヴィッド・アイク(デービッド・アイク)のサイトのヘッドラインの一部を紹介(無保証です)


ブッシュは次の戦争を欲する

ブッシュ大統領は2005年11月11日、ペンシルバニアのTobyhanna陸軍倉庫で、退役軍人を前にして演説を行った。この演説は、これまでの大統領の演説の中でも、(次の戦争を欲しているという)大統領の考えを明瞭に表しているものだ。次の戦争は、ブッシュと急進的キリスト教派による「急進的イスラム」に対する戦いの開始であるが、実際は、すべてのイスラム教徒に向けられたものだ。


繰り返すと、ブッシュの論拠に反して、「文明の衝突」は我々(ブッシュとその関係者)によってはじめられた戦争がそれである。これらの戦争で殺される一般人は多大なものになるだろう、また、戦争自体がいつ核戦争に転化するかも知れない。アメリカの政治家と国民が次の戦争の開始を認めるなら、アメリカ人の道徳性につけられた汚点は、何世代にもわたって消えないだろう。



アイクの言葉

 いろいろな出来事を計画的に現実化してゆくこと。これは、2012年へのカウントダウンの日々に大きな恐怖を生み出すだろう。この計画には、イスラム世界を西欧への「聖戦」に駆り立てること、また、中国を使って世界的な紛争を起こすことが、たぶん両方とも入っている。-アイクが1998年に『大いなる秘密』で書いている。




元記事

http://www.counterpunch.org/christison11162005.html


November 16, 2005


Do the People of the United States Care Enough to Stop Him?

Evidence Mounts That Bush Wants New Wars

By BILL CHRISTISON

Former CIA analyst


In this his time of troubles, Bush seems to be moving deliberately and rapidly toward new wars of aggression in an unforgivable gamble to overcome his troubles. His speech on Veterans' Day, November 11, 2005 at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania leads to this conclusion more clearly than any of his previous speeches and activities. The new wars would be the start of a world war initiated by Bush and radical Christianity against what he calls radical Islam, but in truth the wars would be waged against all Islam.


To repeat, despite Bush's arguments to the contrary, the "clash of civilizations" would consist of wars started by us. The killing of innocent people in these wars is likely to be massive, and the wars could at any time turn nuclear. If the people and the politicians of America allow these wars to take place, the stain on the morality of Americans will last for generations.


Let's note some of the statements Bush made in this speech of November 11. Many are not new, and some were foreshadowed in a speech by Bush a month ago, but their volume and intensity in the Veterans' Day speech are noteworthy.


"Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; and still others, Islamo-fascism . . . These extremists distort the idea of jihad into a call for terrorist murder against Christians and Hindus and Jews -- and against Muslims, themselves, who do not share their radical vision."


" . . . these extremists want to end American and Western influence in the broader Middle East, because we stand for democracy and peace, and stand in the way of their ambitions."


" . . . these militants believe that controlling one country will rally the Muslim masses, enabling them to overthrow all moderate governments in the region, and establish a radical Islamic empire that spans from Spain to Indonesia."


" . . . the terrorists would be able to advance their stated agenda: to develop weapons of mass destruction; to destroy Israel; to intimidate Europe; to assault the American people; and to blackmail our government into isolation."


"The influence of Islamic radicalism is also magnified by helpers and enablers. They've been sheltered by authoritarian regimes -- allies of convenience like Iran and Syria -- that share the goal of hurting America and modern Muslim governments, and use terrorist propaganda to blame their own failures on the West, on America, and on the Jews."


"The government of Syria must do what the international community has demanded . . . The government of Syria must stop exporting violence and start importing democracy."


"Over the years these extremists have used a litany of excuses for violence: the Israeli presence on the West Bank, the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, the defeat of the Taliban, or the Crusades of a thousand years ago. In fact, we're not facing a set of grievances that can be soothed and addressed. We're facing a radical ideology with inalterable objectives: to enslave whole nations and intimidate the world. No act of ours invited the rage of killers -- and no concession, bribe, or act of appeasement would change or limit their plans for murder."


"The murderous ideology of the Islamic radicals is the great challenge of our new century. Yet in many ways, this fight resembles the struggle against communism in the last century. Like the ideology of communism, Islamic radicalism is elitist, led by a self-appointed vanguard that presumes to speak for the Muslim masses."


"Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy teaches that innocent individuals can be sacrificed to serve a political vision. And this explains their cold-blooded contempt for human life."


"These militants are not just the enemies of America or the enemies of Iraq, they are the enemies of Islam and they are the enemies of humanity. And we have seen this kind of shameless cruelty before -- in the heartless zealotry that led to the gulags, the Cultural Revolution, and the killing fields."


"Like the ideology of communism, our new enemy is dismissive of free peoples -- claiming that men and women who live in liberty are weak and decadent."


"And Islamic radicalism, like the ideology of communism, contains inherent contradictions that doom it to failure. By fearing freedom . . . this ideology undermines the very qualities that make human progress possible . . . And whatever lies ahead in the war against this ideology, the outcome is not in doubt . . . Because free peoples believe in the future, free peoples will own the future."


" . . . we're determined to deny radical groups the support and sanctuary of outlaw regimes. State sponsors like Syria and Iran have a long history of collaboration with terrorists, and they deserve no patience from the victims of terror. The United States makes no distinction between those who commit acts of terror and those who support and harbor them, because they're equally guilty of murder."


"We don't know . . . the sacrifices that might lie ahead. We do know, however, that the defense of freedom is worth our sacrifice, we do know the love of freedom is the mightiest force of history, and we do know the cause of freedom will once again prevail."


We cannot be sure how much of this is bluff by Bush -- to what extent he hopes or believes that Muslim nations will surrender to him without a fight. The prudent assumption is that not much of it is bluff, and that Bush, the radical Christians, the Christian Zionists, the nation's military-industrial conglomerates, and their Israeli allies -- all of whom today call the tune in U.S. foreign policy -- are willing and in some cases actually wish to involve the United States in further wars.


The people and the politicians of this country should rise from their apathy and shout, "No." The time is past for useless analysis and discussion. We Americans, accounting for no more than five percent of the human inhabitants of this globe, should decide here and now whether we are going to be moral or immoral in our future relationships with the rest of the world.


Bill Christison was a senior official of the CIA. He served as a National Intelligence Officer and as Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis. He can be reached at christison@counterpunch.org
.



蛇足


2012年に
向かって、イルミナティなどの世界支配層はミッションとしての「人間牧場」へ駆り立てられているのだろうか・?。何世紀にもわたって人類の家畜化、歴史の捏造、政治経済の歪曲、人間性の喪失に努力を傾けていたが、21世紀を向かえ、人間が目覚めつつあるので危機感を募らせているのだろうか?。アジアの人間性無視の政策(共産主義支配、民主専制を作り,歴史捏造、人間性無視、日本へ寄生し霊性の破壊)を支持し、人間牧場化を中国、カンボジア、南北朝鮮、コソボ、イラク、パレスチナで実験したが、全世界の新世界秩序(NWO)へとつなげたい・・。2012年までに目処が立たなくなって来た?。人類がそのアジェンダの裏側を知ってしまったら、この壮大な計画は挫折してしまうだろう。人類は奴隷種族(神が類人猿の遺伝子からバイオで作くったとシュメールの伝説は言う。)、支配層は宇宙人(神)の子孫と言うシュメール(イラク・・歴史捏造本山イラクの占領)以来の秘密組織などの陰謀説は大いなる妄想か??現実だろうか?世界のアチコチで、歴史がつながらない現象が現れている(日本にも古代からある・・いずれ検証しましょう)。集団催眠の状態から脱するのは何時だろう?

スポンサーサイト



コメントの投稿

非公開コメント

プロフィール

kane552004

Author:kane552004
FC2ブログへようこそ!

最新記事
最新コメント
最新トラックバック
月別アーカイブ
カテゴリ
検索フォーム
RSSリンクの表示
リンク
ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

QRコード
QR